How is it not? In the not so distant past of the 1930s there were political parties advocating for the mass killing of people with disabilities, or at least the sterilization of those with heritable disabilities. There have been real campaigns in that period that did this type of forced sterilization, especially in some mental hospitals. You'll still find people espousing such beliefs, thankfully at the fringes for now.
Accessibility is the opposite position of that - but it's by no means a universally accepted good, unfortunately, especially when it requires extra effort to implement.
> In the not so distant past of the 1930s there were political parties advocating for the mass killing of people with disabilities
Those parties still exist today.
- https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/fox-friends-h...
Seems weird to me that anyone would frame it like this.
In my country (Spain) we put eg ramps for wheelchairs no matter the political party. It's considered a human rights or moral issue, not a political one.
I would bet Franco was not really putting up ramps for disabled people. That a political party is not currently represented in your country (thankfully!!) doesn't mean that the topic is not political.
Going from "we're a small non-profit and we're struggling finding a good solution that's also accessible, this really sucks – we're sorry" to eugenics is quite a leap.
My response was to someone asking how accessibility can be considered a political topic. I assumed they were asking in general.