You're mad because they left a vendor because they switched to a different vendor that you think is just as bad but also you're accusing them of starting an "inevitable purity spiral?" Which one is it?
You're mad because they left a vendor because they switched to a different vendor that you think is just as bad but also you're accusing them of starting an "inevitable purity spiral?" Which one is it?
It didn't seem to me that the person you answered to was "mad". Are you "mad" because of what they wrote?
It's not in conflict. They are pointing out that in this case their stated goal was not achieved so it's pointless.
It wasn't their stated goal, if you read linked article. The commenter got it wrong.
Enlighten me, they specifically mention ICE as a reason they wanted to switch from GitHub?
They mention it in passing before continuing with technical issues.
They don't state it as the only reason as you imply, but as something that contributed to their decision.
I am well aware it was not the only reason, but that does not improve the reasoning.