new | ask | show | jobs
johnisgood 4 months ago  [ - ]

I do not think that [0] was vibe coded. Vibe coding something does not mean that everything is vibe coded, or at least I would have never expected it to be the case.

AdieuToLogic 4 months ago  [ - ]

> I do not think that [0] was vibe coded. Vibe coding something does not mean that everything is vibe coded ...

The author claims in the project README.md[0]:

  I was working on something else and as a side effect 
  accidently vibe coded a prolog interpretor on my phone over 
  the weekend.
And has yet to show any evidence of "vibe coding", to the point where I chose one of many commits challenging this position.

So there are two reasonable explanations:

  A) There is no way to show prompts used when "vibe coding".
  B) This claim of "vibe coding" a Prolog is disingenuous.
Which do you think is the case?

0 - https://github.com/nlothian/Vibe-Prolog

johnisgood 4 months ago  [ - ]

README.md is definitely an output of an LLM.

As for the rest of the code, it could be. Are there any obvious patterns you have found to be LLM generated?

In any case, my point is that a typo probably does not have to use LLM to fix that single typo.

So you can use LLMs but it is probably not used for everything, for example this typo.