You didn't look very hard. The person that I replied to said " Disciplined use of c, with modern tools like valgrind, will give you safe code".
You didn't look very hard. The person that I replied to said " Disciplined use of c, with modern tools like valgrind, will give you safe code".
You took "safe" to be "100% safe, never breaks" but you could have understood it as just "relatively safe" or "a lot safer". They even hinted at the cost that comes with more heavy-handed approaches, which by the way aren't perfectly safe either.
Btw. kindly look at the other issue that I overconfidently waved away as "probably a false positive"?