Perhaps bad taste, but bots could also be legitimately purposely violating the most private or traumatizing moments a vulnerable person has in any exploitative way it cares to. I am not sure using bad taste is enough of an excuse to not discuss the issue as many people do in fact use the internet for sexual things. If anything consent should be MORE important because it is easier to document and verify.
A vast hoard of personal information exists and most of it never had or will have proper consent, knowledge, or protection.
> the most private or traumatizing moments a vulnerable person has
...and in this hypothetical, this person is serving them via an unauthenticated http server and hoping that clients will respect robots.txt?
Robots are supposed to behave. It was a solved problem 30 years ago until AI bros unsolved it. Any entity that does not obey robots.txt is by definition a malicious actor.