>Possibly, depending on intent. But even if so, obstruction of justice is not fraud.

Sure, but it's a crime still. Not just something neutral.

>This hypothetical crime (which I'd say is highly unlikely to occur) would definitely not be treason, which has a narrow legal definition. We're not at war with Israel.

No, just on several on behalf of them.

Which one feels should also have been part of this "narrow legal definition".