The assertion was 'if it's colonisation, it's colonisation with about a dozen caveats'. Some of the caveats that come to mind:

- when the colonists began colonizing, there were already a minority of jews in the region

- many of the colonizers believed themselves, with some reason, to be native to the land

- most israelis today, through no fault of their own, were born in israel

- when zionists came to colonize israel, it was already colonized (twice over)

- the initial colonization was carried out 'legally' (though, in hindsight, what that means is questionable)

- many of the colonizers were fleeing persecution and, especially around the holocaust, had no nations willing to accept them as immigrants

> many of the colonizers were fleeing persecution and, especially around the holocaust, had no nations willing to accept them as immigrants

So they take over someone else's land and massacre and displace the locals? Sounds about right /s

[deleted]