> This sets a dangerous precedent for selective enforcement of ToS really
It’s only a dangerous precedent if you believe your opponents will ever gain power. If you believe your political opponents will never have power again, then who cares about precedent?
>It’s only a dangerous precedent if you believe your opponents will ever gain power. If you believe your political opponents will never have power again, then who cares about precedent?
And that kind of thinking in years past is EXACTLY why we're here annoyed by dozens of organizations having and using power they probably ought not to.
Well, still dangerous for the people its used against.
Missing this point is alarming.
It’s possible loveich does not morally agree with their own post, but are providing it as an opposing view.
I think his post is meant to be interpreted about like holding up a mirror in response to "who done this?".
> if you believe your opponents will ever gain power.
Or are already in power.