I doubt this. I've done AI annotation work on the big models. Part of my job was comparing two model outputs and rating which is better, and using detailed criteria to explain why it's better. The HF part.
That's a lot of expensive work they're doing, and ignoring, if they're just later poisoning the models!
GP kind of implying that AGI is already there, and all companies are just dumbing them down because of regulations of the law.
I'm like "Sure buddy, sure. And the nanobots are in all vaccines, right?"