No, it isn't the continuum fallacy.

I'm not claiming that a continuous range exists, and that one end cannot be distinguished from the other because the slope between those points is gradual. I'm claiming that there is a category, called technology, and everything in that category is subject to that argument.

If you want to dispute that, it's incumbent on you to provide evidence for why some technology subcategories should not be subject to that argument.

Specifically: You need to present a case for why AI devices like the one discussed in TFA should not be evaluated in terms of their risks and benefits to society.

Good luck with that argument.