Not considered? The words "Google Play" are in the judgment 47 times. Maybe you could read it?
By your logic, each of the two companies could use the other as an example and then both get away with breaking competition law. Two wrongs don't make a right.
> comparable yet notably omitted from the ranges the tribunal considered
Interesting to accuse people of not reading the document in a post where you don’t read a 3 sentence comment.