While no one will deny you (or I guess your system) the immense satisfaction of 100x improvement on a given step, I think it would be helpful to note the frequency of this rebalancing step, and to contextualize your result in terms of the runtime (or throughput) of the workload(s) you were using to evaluate.

e: also comparison a fixed (nothing faster than 0!) and random policy might be informative if your intent is to publish this as improvement for the object problem, not just a demonstration of ARDS.