Every time I see a bait and switch like this, I'm thinking for myself "well, this could have been easily covered by AGPL...if they were actually interested in keeping it Open Source".

Oftentimes the company is worried about not being able to make revenue by providing hosted services, which is fair and I understand it. But please if you do this, don't do a bait and switch like this. Relicense it as AGPL which covers hosted services just the same as GPL would cover binary builds.

Anyways, thank you very much for this. As a former early adopter of snowplow in my infrastructure I really appreciate the fork and its new life!