Human verified the video -> human was the decision-maker. No human verified the video -> Human who gave a blank check to the AI system was the decision-maker. It's not really about the quality of journalism, here.
Human verified the video -> human was the decision-maker. No human verified the video -> Human who gave a blank check to the AI system was the decision-maker. It's not really about the quality of journalism, here.
Please provide the quote from the story that says which of those is the case.
We're talking about who should be charged with a crime. I sincerely hope we're going to do more discovery than "ask Dexerto to summarize what WBAL-TV 11 News said".
> Police later showed him the AI-captured image that triggered the alert. The crumpled Doritos bag in his pocket had been mistaken for a gun.
That quote sorta suggests that the police got the alert, looked at the photo, and was like "yeah, that could be a gun, let's go".
Still dumb.
If the police actually thought it was a gun, what would be the "smart" thing to do?