I want to understand what you said.

You assumed the leader is corrupt, possibly assumed the leader has bad intentions, and that the world can't possibly be more complex than these assumptions. Assumed the leader made this choice instead of a team behind him.

Then presented a generality. Possibly assumed he doesn't know more than you and "everyone who won't say anything".

Called an entire administration a circus. Another generality.

Suggested bribery without evidence.

How does one respond constructively to a comment like this?