Did you want to emphasize or clarify the first danger I mentioned?

My read of the "Um" and the quoting, was that you thought I missed that first danger, and so were disagreeing in a dismissive way.

When actually we're largely in agreement about the first danger. But people trying to follow a flood of online dialogue might miss that.

I mentioned the second danger because it's also significant. Many people don't understand how safety works, and will think "nobody got shot, so the system must have worked, nothing to be concerned about". But it's harder for even those people to dismiss the situation entirely, when the second danger is pointed out.