Also, that reputation was earned before 2010 when every asshole jumped into "technology" for the fat paycheck.
It used to be hard and a liability to be a nerd
Also, that reputation was earned before 2010 when every asshole jumped into "technology" for the fat paycheck.
It used to be hard and a liability to be a nerd
I don't know, Linus Torvalds was kind of notorious before 2010 for gatekeeping in not-so-constructive ways.
I'm pretty sure this would also render the dot-com bubble the nerds fault?
Let's not go back to how nerd culture used to be regarding diversity... or lack thereof.
I remember when Bill Gates was on magazine covers, viewed as a genius, a wonderful philanthropist, even spoofed in Animaniacs as "Bill Greats."
I guess my point is, "It used to be hard and a liability to be a nerd" was never true, and is nothing but industry cope. The good old days were just smaller, more homogenous, had more mutually-shared good old toxicity and misogyny (to levels that would probably get permabans here within minutes; there's been a lot of collective memory-holing on that), combined with greater idolization of tech billionaires.
> I don't know, Linus Torvalds was kind of notorious before 2010 for gatekeeping in not-so-constructive ways.
What changed in 2010?
Nothing. He was toxic for almost a decade after that.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/09/linus-torvalds-apolo...
Everybody jumped into technology for fat paychecks long before 2010