Unfortunately, this narrative's utility is pretty low and it's intended implications are severely weakened by the current administration's obsession with revenge, blaming everything on someone else, and persecuting political opponents. If such openly hostile and norms-breaking rhetoric did not exist before the pardons, then the pardons would appear suspicious.
This is nonsense.
The Biden administration went after Trump's lawyers, censored American citizens that supported Trump, and put people in prison for years that walked near the capital on J6 (and never participated in the riots).
In addition to this, Trump was brought up on federal charges that we still don't know today. They were: Charge 1..2..3..4. If you look at all of the court documents released, they didn't even have evidence of an actual crime.
It fell apart so quickly, it was so obviously made up.
Biden's family took money from foreign governments and was definitely involved in Ukraine corruption. It was pretty evident Hunter would have been brought up on charges and sentenced to a long prison sentence, if not for the pardon. This isn't even mentioning anything linking Biden to the crimes, which was a real possibility during the investigation.
It's not revenge, it's justice. I also want justice for the the corrupt politicians during the previous administrations that always seem to get out of everything.
Hillary ran an email server from her office that contained government emails, and you are really going to tell me that there's 'nothing to see here'? We would still be hearing about it today if anyone on the other side had done the same thing.
The real crimes started when Trump was running in his first term and Obama colluded with Russian agents to spy on him. This is really supposed to be okay with no punishment?
All eyes are on Trump and the only thing even close to a crime that was found was bringing home documents that he was allowed to declassify. Something every politician in history has done.
After what I've witnessed in the last decade, it really makes me question the accuracy of our history books.
> It was pretty evident Hunter would have been brought up on charges
No it wasn't. Trump had to threaten Zelenskyy to accuse him at all, which backfired immediately when Zelenskyy denied the accusations. He still claims that Trump manufactured the charges, and we haven't seen any damning evidence that suggests they were credible. I wager that's because the "evidence" wouldn't discredit Biden unless a court was forcibly compelled to do so.
> Hillary ran an email server from her office that contained government emails
This may be news to you, but government officials are allowed to use third-party communique to transmit non-sensitive and declassified information. The reason Hillary was never brought up on charges was because they never found any proof of wrongdoing. Same as Trump's SCIFs, if you want to go there.
> The real crimes started when Trump was running in his first term and Obama colluded with Russian agents to spy on him.
Again, source? We have no evidence that Obama was a Russian agent, whereas several retired KGB officers have attested to Trump's enrollment. I think you're misremembering a few details, but I beg you to link a high quality source if one exists.