Am I the only one that thinks this is very unwholesome? Giving a simulacrum of human interaction to children who are presumably waay to young to understand [1] that they're talking to a novelty device. It's possible I'm being a luddite but then again perhaps people really need to stop trying to achieve 100% completion in turning Black Mirror episodes into reality.
[1] Which even many adults apparently don't understand!
On one hand, I totally get where you are coming from and feel similarly. On the other hand, we take our kids to the mall and tell them that lowly paid actor is _really_ Santa and he _really_ wants to hear what they want, and he totally isn't just counting down the minutes to his next smoke break. That doesn't strike me as an "authentic" human interaction so I'm ambivalent.
> tell them that lowly paid actor is _really_ Santa and he _really_ wants to hear what they want
To be fair, that is also pretty wild to me.
My 5 (at the time 4) year old always understood. We made a game out of it of ‘making new toys’ and she would tell me what it should say.
I would cut open toys and shove microcontrollers in them.
I think if you lie and tell a kid it’s a real person it would be damaging. My kid has fun role playing, she really suspends disbelief. When done she thinks it’s funny though/not confused.
Then why does the product description continually reiterate how “real” the conversations are?
Don’t worry, this is just the version for the proles, the higher caste kids will have actual humans playing Santa on the other end of their phones.