TVs are much cheaper than monitors. They are produced in larger numbers and their lower price is enabled by spying and advertising.
TVs are much cheaper than monitors. They are produced in larger numbers and their lower price is enabled by spying and advertising.
Agree, but also, much worse image quality. Put a, for example 32" TV and a monitor one next to each other, set native resolution, put up a screen with a lot of text, and you'll see - the difference is night and day.
>Agree, but also, much worse image quality.
I managed to grab a 55" 8K LG before 8K went out of fashion. I run it at 4k120 for games and 8k60 with doubling for productivity.
I've never had a better monitor and if one should exist it's not available in any store I know about. Monitors costing 2-3x as much as this TV did back then are worse. When it dies I will have to downgrade. :-/
Hmmm, I'm confused now: aren't 8K displays just becoming a thing? Your perspective sounds like they are a dying breed. In the meantime, for me, they are still prohibitively expensive.
TV panels optimize for viewing video (including subtitles) NOT for text-intensive work.
So you find that TV panels are much larger at lower price points than computer monitors because they serve different purposes.