you're stretching the definition of deception here my guy-what do you want them to do? plaster a big sign on the landing page stating that this framework ALSO contains pro features that you have to pay for?
I've commented above that this seems like a bad approach, but it sure feels like a lack of awareness vs. an intentional dark pattern. The internet makes it so easy to assume the worst but I think this is a case where we should start with the most charitable interpretation.
I'm confused. Datastar is a free open source framework that you can choose to use or not.
It's weird to call them out as indecent and deceitful for not actively marketing features that they really don't think you need. Even when you think you need it, they've actively encouraged people to analyze their problems to identify if it's a real need or a gap in hypermedia fundamentals knowledge.
Also, the top nav has a Pro page that has what you're looking for.
you're stretching the definition of deception here my guy-what do you want them to do? plaster a big sign on the landing page stating that this framework ALSO contains pro features that you have to pay for?
> what do you want them to do?
> plaster a big sign on the landing page stating that this framework ALSO contains pro features that you have to pay for?
Yes.
I for one don't enjoy being on the receiving end of these marketing dark patterns and manipulation tactics.
I've commented above that this seems like a bad approach, but it sure feels like a lack of awareness vs. an intentional dark pattern. The internet makes it so easy to assume the worst but I think this is a case where we should start with the most charitable interpretation.
Dark pattern? Pro plugins are built in the same way as is accessible to any user. What's the real issue?
That you have to go looking, actively, to realise there is a paid option.
[flagged]
> what do you want them to do?
The common thing to do today is put a "pricing" menu item at the top right. That'd be fine.
> plaster a big sign
Yes!! That's table stakes. It's the bare minimum needed to not be considered malice.
Why? What is at stake?
Basic decency of being upfront about your business model, and in general being upfront and not being deceitful in life.
Anyways, constructively, they should add a usual pricing page with a nav for that at the top of the landing page.
It makes it clear that something is priced, right on the landing page.
In the pricing page the cards better make the costs super clear.
I'm confused. Datastar is a free open source framework that you can choose to use or not.
It's weird to call them out as indecent and deceitful for not actively marketing features that they really don't think you need. Even when you think you need it, they've actively encouraged people to analyze their problems to identify if it's a real need or a gap in hypermedia fundamentals knowledge.
Also, the top nav has a Pro page that has what you're looking for.
”Ready for liftoff?” should have a go-pro button. That’s all that is needed.
Why have a call-to-action to something they don't want you to do?
It's only there for Pro users and people who want to support the project [1] and not normal use.
[1] https://data-star.dev/essays/greedy_developer