I sort of agree with Safari's call - a lot of Chrome's functionality is declined by Safari on reasons that it enables fingerprinting. For that reason I think the site is misleading in its rating of privacy.

But I don't think Google's to blame for making a different choice about it. It's picking a different privacy / functionality trade-off, but it's doing it with open standards that others are free to implement if they want.

It's putting some pressure on Apple because users often care more about functionality than about privacy, but not so much that they're worried about it, I think. They seem to be doing well!