Right -- so pandering to their listeners is OK then?
Of course. GP's suggestion was that, because they're not pandering to corporate interests, there are fewer compromises in their news coverage. Which isn't necessarily true since they're just pandering to a different audience.
My God I had that so wrong. Thanks for clarifying.
Of course. GP's suggestion was that, because they're not pandering to corporate interests, there are fewer compromises in their news coverage. Which isn't necessarily true since they're just pandering to a different audience.
My God I had that so wrong. Thanks for clarifying.