One must naturally make assumptions when responding to something that is poorly defined or communicated. That's just how it is. That's an issue for the original poster, not the responder.

The terminology of AI has a strong link with LLMs/GenAI. Quite reasonable.

As for code/architecture/infrastructure I like those things too. You do have to shape your communications to the audience you are talking to though. A lot of the products have eliminated the demand for such jobs, and its a false elimination so there will be an overcorrection later in a whipsaw, but by that time I'll have changed careers because the jobs weren't there. I'm an architect, with 10+ years of experience, not a single job offer in 2 years with tens of thousands of submissions in that time.

If there is no economic opportunity you have to go where the jobs are. When executives play stupid games based in monopoly to drive wages down, they win stupid prizes.

Sometime around 2 years is the max time-frame before you get brain drain for these specialized fields, and when that happens those people stop contributing to the overall public parts of the sector entirely. They take their expertise, and use it for themselves only, because that is the only value it can provide and there's no winning when the economy becomes delusional and divorced from reality.

You have AI eliminating demand for specialized labor that requires at least 5 years of experience to operate competently, AI flooding the communication space with jammed speech (for hiring through a mechanism similar to RNA interference), and you have professional certificate providers retiring all benefits, and long-lasting certificates that prove competency on top of the coordinated layoffs by big tech in the same time period. Eliminating the certificate path as a viable option for the competent but un-accredited through university.

You've got a dead industry. Its dead, but it doesn't know it yet. Such is the problem with chaotic whipsaws and cascading failures that occur on a lag. By the time the problem is recognized, it will be too late to correct (because of hysteresis).

Such aggregate stupidity in collapsing the labor pool is why there is a silent collapse going on in the industry, and why so many people cannot find work.

The level of work that can be expected now in such places because of such ill will by industry is abyssal.

Given such fierce loss and arbitrarily enforced competition, who in their right mind would actually design resilient infrastructure properly; knowing it will chug away for years without issue after they lay you off with no intent towards maintenance (making money all that time).

A time is fast approaching where you won't find the people competent enough to know how to do the job right, at any price.