I know. But that doesn't make it accurate. And in broader strokes, I'm not fond of that thread/comment being used to pretend that all new and shiny things are better than what came before. Sometimes the new thing is barely more than a coat of paint on the existing thing.
Assuming perfect memory and you never make typos they are exactly the same. For most installs. Or distros. Probably.
You don't need to memorize
alias bat='f(){ cat "$1" | highlight --force -O xterm256 | less -SRNI; }; f'
For all the other issues people have pointed out, this assumes you have `highlight` installed.
As opposed to having bat installed?
> Assuming perfect memory and you never make typos they are exactly the same.
You can make an alias.
> For most installs. Or distros. Probably.
Comparing https://repology.org/project/bat-cat/packages vs https://repology.org/project/highlight/packages appears to show them with approximately equal availability. (Unless you're trying some other point, in which case I don't follow.)
I don’t know if it still uses librsync but for a long time Dropbox was based directly upon it.
Whether this proves or disproves anything in re syntax highlighting utilities I leave as an exercise.
It's a reference to this:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863
I know. But that doesn't make it accurate. And in broader strokes, I'm not fond of that thread/comment being used to pretend that all new and shiny things are better than what came before. Sometimes the new thing is barely more than a coat of paint on the existing thing.