The left is statistically more likely to publicly endorse political violence looking at data over the past few years. The right is more likely to actually commit political violence though looking over all data over decades and that still holds today.

Far-left versus Far-right Fatal Violence: An Empirical Assessment of the Prevalence of Ideologically Motivated Homicides in the United States

One side is all shout and no bite. The other is no shout and then eat your fucking face.

I'll take the idiots shouting but not actually killing if I had to pick. But I won't lie the choice still makes me feel dirty.

>The left is statistically more likely to publicly endorse political violence looking at data over the past few years.

Only endorsing or actually committing? Let's ask Charlie Kirk.

>One side is all shout and no bite. The other is no shout and then eat your fucking face.

Which is which in this anecdote?