One problem is that, like on a recipe page, the core ideas are stretched into a longer narrative.
And then the reader has to consume the narrative to derive the core ideas themself.
So it's off-putting that the reader has to split off the narrative chaff that you didn't even write and/or spend the time editing.
At some point it makes more sense to publish a minimal paragraph of your core ideas, and the reader can paste it into an LLM if they want a clanker to couch it extra content.
One problem is that, like on a recipe page, the core ideas are stretched into a longer narrative.
And then the reader has to consume the narrative to derive the core ideas themself.
So it's off-putting that the reader has to split off the narrative chaff that you didn't even write and/or spend the time editing.
At some point it makes more sense to publish a minimal paragraph of your core ideas, and the reader can paste it into an LLM if they want a clanker to couch it extra content.
> Is it AI then if there’s a human author? lol. You are funny.
You have now updated the article to admit using AI to write it.
So why is it funny that I recognized it as AI?