Yeah but those are separate claims. "Lead causes health problem, and vicious cycles are a thing, therefore health problems cause lead!" is not a valid shape for an argument. It may well be true, but both directions have to be established before calling it a vicious cycle.

In this case, I can agree bad social conditions cause gambling, but I don't think the data supports the opposite, at least not more than many other things we take for granted, such as

- alcohol,

- beauty/fashion industries,

- social media,

etc.

Cause-and-effect relationships can be complicated and it is important not to jump to conclusions, but do you deny that there are millions of Americans who can correctly identify an addiction when they see it in someone they have some sort of ongoing relationshp with (either because they have training and experience in treating addiction or because they themselves or someone close to them were once addicted)?

Do you deny that those observers can correctly identify the substance or the activity that the addict is addicted to?

Do you deny that addiction is quite deleterious both to the addict and to the people with whom the addict is in some kind of relationship?

Many news stories claim that many Americans (young men particularly) are getting addicted to online sports betting. Do you dispute the accuracy of those news stories?

If so, can you guess as to the motivation for publishing these inaccurate news stories? Often a campaign to mislead the public is done because some group would gain something quite valuable if the campaign is successful. What would any group have to gain (aside from a slightly healthier country) from a successful campaign to make online sports betting illegal?

I do not dispute any of that. Many young Americans also get addicted to alcohol. Many young Americans self-harm over unrealistic ideals brought to them by the beauty/fashion industries. Many young Americans get depressed over social media.

We need to help these people, but we do not help them by driving their vices underground.

So, how should we help all the groups of young Americans you mention?

Strong, publically-funded social safety net is a good start, I think. Using vice taxes to contribute money to it is probably a decent idea.

You don't think gambling causes negative societal affects to any greater degree than the fashion industry?

I've not heard any convincing arguments in favour of that hypothesis, no. Have you met young women? They self-harm over unrealistic ideals.