> It competes against languages that give you memory safety by having garbage collection
I wouldn’t use it where I could get away with garbage collection (nor C/C++) but that still leaves enough space for Rust to exist in.
> It competes against languages that give you memory safety by having garbage collection
I wouldn’t use it where I could get away with garbage collection (nor C/C++) but that still leaves enough space for Rust to exist in.
I guess I just very rarely find problems where GC isn't an option. Even the ones where people say "this has to be fast so we can't use a GC" usually work well with a GC.