Absolutely unacceptable that their TOS basically gives them unrestricted access to your datasets, as far as I read it. The terms let them use your datasets for pretty much whatever they decide they want to do with it (though they do say they would anonymize the data, which isn't especially helpful). The TOS leaves a lot of wiggle room for them to do pretty much whatever they want to the data.
I wouldn't touch this until they get serious about having real assurances that they're not going to access customer data without a real, justifiable reason. If Amazon gave themselves free reign to read S3 data it would be outrageous, this is basically the same thing.
But hey, it “empowers researchers and hackers to experiment with models by giving them control over the algorithms and data”.
PR and marketing will literally write anything they can get away with. Thanks for pointing out the TOS hole.
>Absolutely unacceptable Entitled much!? hold on to you pants.
They've clearly called out that organizations can contact them for their specific needs..
Your datasets are some of your most valuable assets. How is it entitled to not want your vendor having a free for all with them? It would be entitled if they weren't going to be charging for it.
That should not be the default