You replied to a two sentence comment. One of the sentences was about this case and the one that followed (which you quote in your most recent reply) appears to be about this case as well. When you take it out of context, it could be about this case or about the current court in general.

But anyone reading the parent comment and your comment would have no idea that in your mind, you were replying to a general reading of the second sentence.

It's also worth noting that none of Justice Jackson's colleagues (even the other liberal ones) joined her outraged dissent. It was essentially 8-1 against. The current decision proves that she was in fact incorrect.