Right but it’s hallucinating the right colours which to me feels like some data is leaking somewhere. Because no way wifi sees colours
Right but it’s hallucinating the right colours which to me feels like some data is leaking somewhere. Because no way wifi sees colours
Different materials and dyes have different dialectical properties. These examples are probably confabulation but I'm sure it's possible in principle.
Assuming you mean dielectric, but I do like the idea that different colors are different arguments in conflict with each other.
Well perhaps it can, a 2.4Ghz antenna is just a very red lightbulb. Maybe material absorption correlates, though it would be a long shot?
You can't even pick colour out of infra-red-illuminated night time photography. There's no way you can pick colour out of WiFi-illuminated photography.
There would be some correlation between the visual color of objects and the spectrum of an object in another EM frequency, many object's color share the same dye or pigment materials, but it seems pretty unlikely that it would be reliable at all with a spectrum of different objects and materials and dyes because there is no universal RGB dye or pigment set we rely upon. You can make the same red color many different ways but each material will have different spectral "colors" outside of the visual range. Even something simple like black plastics can be completely transparent in other spectrums like the PS3 was to infrared. Structural colors would probably be impossible to see discern however I don't think too many household objects have structural colors unless you got a stuffed bird or fish on the wall.
If it sees the shape of a fire extinguisher, the diffusion model will "know" it should be red. But that's not all that's going on here. Hair color etc seems impossible to guess, right? To be fair I haven't actually read the paper so maybe they explain this
downvoted until you read the paper