Normalizing effective abolishment of consent for imagery, or just consent in general for just about anything, when it can portray anyone doing anything.
If Deepfakes remain the tools of nation state actors, laypeople will be easily fooled.
If Deepfakes are available on your iPhone and within TikTok, everyone will just ask "Is it Photoshop?" for every shred of doubt. (In fact, I already see people saying, "This looks like AI".)
This is good. Normalize the magic until it isn't magic anymore.
People will get it. They're smart. They just need exposure.
> People will get it. They're smart. They just need exposure.
I really doubt this.
If you are in the creative field, your work will just be reduced to "is this slop?" or "fixed it!" with a low effort AI generated work of your original work (fuck copyright right?).
I already see artists battling and fighting putting out their best non AI work only for their audience to question if it is real and they lose the impressiveness.
This just already undermines creators who don't use AI generated stuff.
But who cares about them right? "it is the future" and it is most definitely AGI for them.
But then again, the starving artist never really made any money and this ensures that the artform stays dead.
> People will get it. They're smart. They just need exposure.
It's either this, or the opposite (eg, misinformation needs to be censored). Seems like we as a society can't quite make up our mind on which approach to take.
Normalizing effective abolishment of consent for imagery, or just consent in general for just about anything, when it can portray anyone doing anything.
Ah the great trade off that comes with little to no regulation.
Honestly this is the safest possible outcome.
If Deepfakes remain the tools of nation state actors, laypeople will be easily fooled.
If Deepfakes are available on your iPhone and within TikTok, everyone will just ask "Is it Photoshop?" for every shred of doubt. (In fact, I already see people saying, "This looks like AI".)
This is good. Normalize the magic until it isn't magic anymore.
People will get it. They're smart. They just need exposure.
> People will get it. They're smart. They just need exposure.
I really doubt this.
If you are in the creative field, your work will just be reduced to "is this slop?" or "fixed it!" with a low effort AI generated work of your original work (fuck copyright right?).
I already see artists battling and fighting putting out their best non AI work only for their audience to question if it is real and they lose the impressiveness.
This just already undermines creators who don't use AI generated stuff.
But who cares about them right? "it is the future" and it is most definitely AGI for them.
But then again, the starving artist never really made any money and this ensures that the artform stays dead.
> People will get it. They're smart. They just need exposure.
It's either this, or the opposite (eg, misinformation needs to be censored). Seems like we as a society can't quite make up our mind on which approach to take.