Perhaps that's an overly cynical take? It doesn't read like AI slop to me, more like an overview of the video. As someone who finds it hard to get solid answers online anymore, I found this article genuinely informative (though, of course, the video provides the most value.)
Parts of the article repeat other parts of that article.
If you're saying that was done by a human, rather than by AI - then things are even worse.
the point of the article/website appears to be to collect useful resources. as such it probably works better than trying to find and select useful videos directly.