I would think the commission of state crimes would have an impact on the contract. If the city does nothing they would be an accessory to those crimes
I would think the commission of state crimes would have an impact on the contract. If the city does nothing they would be an accessory to those crimes
The core of the debate is that Flock has "fixed the issue", and hence doesn't think the contract should be escapable, the services provided today are ostensibly legal. Definitely a question for lawyers on how the exact terms shake out, if the city has an out or if Flock met their obligations by fixing the access issue.
> Flock has "fixed the issue"
Strong office space vibes in this one [1].
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUE0PPQI3is
It’ll just work itself out naturally.