i just don't use commits like you do, and that doesn't mean i'm being less careful or less thoughtful, or that my changes are worse than yours
commits are what i say they are, nothing more or less
i just don't use commits like you do, and that doesn't mean i'm being less careful or less thoughtful, or that my changes are worse than yours
commits are what i say they are, nothing more or less
Everyone's free to do what he wants, of course, but I'm arguing that there are strong advantages in making good commits.
Ok, good is subjective, I guess, so let's say commits with good descriptions, all the information that could be useful to understand what they do (and where appropriate, why), and a limited and coherent amount of modifications in each; in short, commits that are easy to follow and will provide what you need to know if you come back to them later.