The is the n-th attempt to install some regulation that would (a) lead to increased surveillance of most of the population; and (b) is trivial to circumvent by those who the government is ostensibly trying to target. So clearly, the cost-benefit ratio is severely skewed for the EU population.
Assuming that the regulators are fully aware of the above points, it's not very hard to speculate what the real intentions behind all of this are.
> The is the n-th attempt to install some regulation
The sad part is that it would only take one attempt to codify the opposite into privacy laws as a basic right, should anyone ever bother to take up that gauntlet.