>Oh yes it is.
>It's enhacing the capabilties of radiologists.
So it is not replacing radiologists?
I guess we have to define 'replace' then. If we need fewer radiologists, does that count as replacing? IDK.
It seems that with AI in particular, many operate with 0/1 thinking in that it can only be useless or take over the world with nothing in between.
Not yet. Time will tell but they have a long way to go if they ever do. They are useful tools now.
I guess we have to define 'replace' then. If we need fewer radiologists, does that count as replacing? IDK.
It seems that with AI in particular, many operate with 0/1 thinking in that it can only be useless or take over the world with nothing in between.
Not yet. Time will tell but they have a long way to go if they ever do. They are useful tools now.