The PR type approach comes from the Linux kernel where there is essentially a hierarchy of gatekeepers with increasing trust and responsibility. It is a very individualistic type approach (i.e. if you merged it into your branch, it's on you and speed is a non-goal for the most part). This is often different from many software projects as it is like a collective where often, no one really has individual responsibility for anything (it is more like collective responsibility), speed is everything and there are certainly no gate keepers - maybe the review actually doesn't matter that much in this context.
If security or bugs don't matter much for your project, sure
I don't think "LGTM" helps with either of those. Making someone personally responsible is the real unlock here.
Personally responsible for the review?
For sure if you can say LGTM without even looking at anything it doesn't make much sense