I agree up to a point, I find nauseating the idea that somebody digged so deep into a person where the most likely explanation is that the goal is to generate outrage with every of their statement (doesn't matter what's the reason). Even social media websites realized that's the way to get traction.
Now if the problem shows up during a professional interaction in work on open source software, causing damage to somebody, I see the point in raising complaints, but that would be a very explicit problem. And even in that case, just fork Rails, they did that with Elm because of poor management, they didn't ask to remove the author of Elm from Elm, they just forked.
> digged so deep into a person
They literally just read his blog.
It doesn't require any amount of digging to learn about DHH's opinions. He writes, tweets, speaks about them. He's an influential voice in the Ruby and Rails communities and any regular participants are likely to hear about him