I'll leave it to you and others who read this to evaluate the columnist's argument in the linked article vs. the UN commissioner's argument published last week in the same publication. https://archive.ph/FP2ek
I'll leave it to you and others who read this to evaluate the columnist's argument in the linked article vs. the UN commissioner's argument published last week in the same publication. https://archive.ph/FP2ek
The UN commissioner ignores all the obvious arguments against his case.
For instance, he ignores that Israel goes out of its way to warn civilians before attacking, and provides aid to civilians. He ignores that Israel could simply kill ALL the civilians with a bunch of bombs if its intent was actually genocide, and yet it has not.
This is not a serious debate. Israel is not genociding. If you disagree, you need to respond to the actual arguments. But nobody on the other side is doing so, because they can't, because Israel is not genociding.
Please think about this.
Please wake up. When the dust settles and people start clearing all those buildings you destroyed you will see that 60,000 casualty number grow by multiples. How will you feel then about what Israel has done?
You are still ignoring the arguments.
Casualties are a sad fact of war. But it's not genocide because Israel's doing everything it can to save the civilians while combatting Hamas. If genocide was defined by the number of deaths, would you say that the US was genocidal against germany during WW2? We killed 3 million civilians to defeat the Nazis.
Good luck in your bubble.
I think it’s quite obvious to everyone in the world that Zionists are the ones in a bubble. I would wish you luck, but how can anyone wish a genocide apologist luck?