I agree that the outcome will be destructive.
The questions are:
Is it is more or less destructive than the alternative destruction? Who is it more economically destructive for? Over what time period is it more or less destructive than the alternative interventionism? Is 6 months a meaningful time horizon?
It becomes muddled very quickly. I would appeal for a consistent approach which opposes both forms of destructive interventionism.
Many things are luck and uncontrollable events. So what you do is focus on not f.ing things up. Current usg is doing the exact opposite.
Agreed. That's a summarized version of the (ECP, knowledge problem) argument against economic interventionism.