I'm an industry interest, in the sense that I work in the software industry and I have an interest in Rust.

Fair enough. I just find it mind boggling how much money flows into completely new language ecosystems compared to improvements for C/C++ tooling which would clearly much more effective if you really cared about overall security of the free software world.

The issue with investing similar levels of effort into making C++ safer is the C++ standards committee doesn't want to adopt those kinds of improvements.

Which is also the reason why we don't have #pragma once and many other extensions like it. Except we do. Compilers can add rust-like static analyzers without the standard committee mandating it.

I am not interested in C++, it is also far too complex. In my opinion software needs to become simpler and not more complicated, and I fear Rust might be a step into the wrong direction.

Personally, I use Rust (and have been using it for close to 9 years) because I've been part of multiple teams that have delivered reliable, performant systems software in it, within a budget that would clearly be impossible in any other language. Rust acts as a step change in getting things done.