I've read it completely differently.
The response IMO is constructive and invites the blog post author for further discussion.
I've read it completely differently.
The response IMO is constructive and invites the blog post author for further discussion.
I think it's likely that both the blog poster and the maintainer are being perceived as more negative in tone than the intent / reality. They both included disclaimers "I must be doing something wrong. And if I am, I'm sorry." and "whatever, it’s their blog so they can do what they want." They're also both giving critical feedback "But, if I'm not, this is a problem right?" "Kinda wish the author would attempt to collaborate rather than write stuff like this" but in both cases the criticism is extremely mildly worded compared to most toxic online discourse. This seems... great? Isn't it good we're able to disagree so politely? It's not toxic to have a disagreement or to give critical feedback. We don't need to all pretend to agree with each other all the time or be happy with each other in order to have a civil discourse.
"but whatever" are two of the most dismissive words when put together. "I see what you've written, but whatever."
It depends on context. When someone raises a potential objection and then says "but whatever" they are being dismissive towards their own objection. This is also called "letting it go" or "moving on".
And posting direct links to the places where discussion actually happens along with providing tldr context is as constructive as you can get. But whatever :)
[dead]