> What decision-making process led to the idea of injecting human urine into a frog in the first place?
Yeah, it makes me think of how many dumb things scientists really did. I bet, that the most of them are unknown because nothing interesting happened.
> are unknown because nothing interesting happened.
Other than the intense suffering of "research animals." Come to think of it that might be why they're kept "unknown."
"Look, I just know injecting the feces of elderly men into badgers is going to pay off. I just need one more grant to buy the seed badgers."
"After how the thing with the phlegm and the horses worked out, it's a hard no."