The suggestion is that the staff know that there is infringing material being hosted. Youtube can point to the billions of dollars they've invested into building content id, continually working to resolve the problem.
The suggestion is that the staff know that there is infringing material being hosted. Youtube can point to the billions of dollars they've invested into building content id, continually working to resolve the problem.
This is interesting, because Youtube staff know they're infringing too -- the expense is something that IA can't afford, but they then get to claim they're doing something. A shield of money. And why does Youtube have all that money; in part because of historic copyright infringement.