Not sure why downvoted. Good journalism here would have been to show the methodology behind the findings or produce a link to a paper. Any article that says "Coffee is bad for you", as an example, that doesn't link to an actual paper or describes the methodology cannot be critically taken at face value. Same thing with this one. Appeal to authority isn't a good way to make a conclusion.

I'm not even gonna ask them to explain the methodology but it's 20-goddamn-25, link your source so that those who want to dig through that stuff can.