Yeah, this is dead wrong.
I'll go in the other direction. With a few exceptions, it is unfortunately true that "a business" isn't just "a way to make money," it's VERY OFTEN "the only reasonable way to accomplish a big-ish goal involving multiple people."
I say this as someone who started a business incidentally, my father had a big project that he and I loved the idea of, and I knew I could put together a good team to do the web part of it, and so I did. Money was NOT the primary motivator.
You’re conflating small business and large business. The moment you have investors return on investment becomes the sole motivating factor and whatever humanity the organization had will be slowly squeezed out from the top down. This isn’t ideological, it is a legal principle. A corporation taking actions that harm returns opens them up to lawsuits.
Edit: worker owned coops don’t have this issue because they are definitionally managed from the bottom up.
Additional edit: the “you” in my post is doing heavy lifting I mean both the post I replied to and the one directly above it.
GGP started with "There isn’t a single business in existence" though.
Hi, thank you for your comment. I have clarified that I was responding to both of the parent posts.
I think you misread. The GGP post did not differentiate by small or large, nor did GP
Hi, thank you for your comment. I have clarified that I was responding to both of the parent posts.
Investors want infinite growth which leads to enshitification.
You’re mistaking motivation with priorities.
The motivation for starting a project/business is very rarely going to be the priority for said business’s survival if it reaches a large enough audience.
That’s just an inevitability of scale — the larger the audience, the harder to focus on one member of said audience and the less any one single member of said audience matters.