> Arbitrary signals are essentially primate dominance tools.
What should I read to better understand this claim?
> LLMs are the equivalent of circles act using language.
Circled apes?
> Arbitrary signals are essentially primate dominance tools.
What should I read to better understand this claim?
> LLMs are the equivalent of circles act using language.
Circled apes?
Basil Bernstein's 1973 studies comparing English and math comprehension differences in class. Halliday's Language and Society Vol 10 Primate Psychology Mastripietri Apes and Evolution Tuttle Symbolic Species Deacon Origin of Speech MacNeilage
That's the tip of the iceberg
edit: As CS doesn't understand the parasitic or viral aspects of language and simply idealizes it, it can't access it. It's more of a black box than the coding of these. I can't understand how CS assumed this would ever work. It makes no sense to exclude the very thing that language is and then automate it.