And why does the linked paper not qualify as such a link?
P.S. Sorry, I was wrong.
Good point. I just thought that a direct link or summary of the formal reasoning would have made it easier for readers unfamiliar with the topic. But fair enough, the linked paper does cover it.
P.S. Sorry, I was wrong.
Good point. I just thought that a direct link or summary of the formal reasoning would have made it easier for readers unfamiliar with the topic. But fair enough, the linked paper does cover it.